Re: [PATCH RESEND drm-misc 4/4] dma-buf: heaps: make dma_heap_class constant
From: "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@google.com>
Date: 2024-03-05 17:07:30
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-media, lkml
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 3:34 AM Ricardo B. Marliere [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Since commit 43a7206b0963 ("driver core: class: make class_register() take a const *"), the driver core allows for struct class to be in read-only memory, so move the dma_heap_class structure to be declared at build time placing it into read-only memory, instead of having to be dynamically allocated at boot time. Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marliere <redacted> --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c index 84ae708fafe7..bcca6a2bbce8 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c@@ -43,10 +43,18 @@ struct dma_heap { struct cdev heap_cdev; }; +static char *dma_heap_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode) +{ + return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "dma_heap/%s", dev_name(dev)); +} + static LIST_HEAD(heap_list); static DEFINE_MUTEX(heap_list_lock); static dev_t dma_heap_devt; -static struct class *dma_heap_class; +static struct class dma_heap_class = { + .name = DEVNAME, + .devnode = dma_heap_devnode, +}; static DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC(dma_heap_minors); static int dma_heap_buffer_alloc(struct dma_heap *heap, size_t len,@@ -261,7 +269,7 @@ struct dma_heap *dma_heap_add(const struct dma_heap_export_info *exp_info) goto err1; } - dev_ret = device_create(dma_heap_class, + dev_ret = device_create(&dma_heap_class, NULL, heap->heap_devt, NULL,@@ -291,7 +299,7 @@ struct dma_heap *dma_heap_add(const struct dma_heap_export_info *exp_info) return heap; err3: - device_destroy(dma_heap_class, heap->heap_devt); + device_destroy(&dma_heap_class, heap->heap_devt); err2: cdev_del(&heap->heap_cdev); err1:@@ -301,11 +309,6 @@ struct dma_heap *dma_heap_add(const struct dma_heap_export_info *exp_info) return err_ret; } -static char *dma_heap_devnode(const struct device *dev, umode_t *mode) -{ - return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "dma_heap/%s", dev_name(dev)); -} - static int dma_heap_init(void) { int ret;@@ -314,12 +317,11 @@ static int dma_heap_init(void) if (ret) return ret; - dma_heap_class = class_create(DEVNAME); - if (IS_ERR(dma_heap_class)) { + ret = class_register(&dma_heap_class); + if (ret) { unregister_chrdev_region(dma_heap_devt, NUM_HEAP_MINORS); - return PTR_ERR(dma_heap_class); + return ret; } - dma_heap_class->devnode = dma_heap_devnode; return 0; } --2.43.0
Reviewed-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@google.com> Is this really a resend? I don't see anything on lore and I can't recall seeing this patch in my inbox before.