Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 2 authors, 2022-09-01

Re: [PATCH] drm: Simplify testing on UML with kunit.py

From: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Date: 2022-09-01 14:49:34
Also in: dri-devel, linux-doc, lkml

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 04:02:53PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi,

On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 03:36:21PM +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote:
quoted
DRM depends on IOMEM and DMA, introduce an additional Kconfig to pull in
IOMEM and DMA emulation on UML.
Since --kconfig_add usage is no longer needed, remove it from
documentation.

Signed-off-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst | 7 +------
 drivers/video/Kconfig               | 4 ++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst
index 5fd20a306718..c264a9587d21 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-internals.rst
@@ -228,16 +228,11 @@ follows:
 
 .. code-block:: bash
 
-	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm/tests \
-		--kconfig_add CONFIG_VIRTIO_UML=y \
-		--kconfig_add CONFIG_UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO=y
+	$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=drivers/gpu/drm/tests
 
 .. note::
 	The configuration included in ``.kunitconfig`` should be as generic as
 	possible.
-	``CONFIG_VIRTIO_UML`` and ``CONFIG_UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO`` are not
-	included in it because they are only required for User Mode Linux.
-
I'm all for removing that part of the documentation, but because
6fc3a8636a7b, in 6.0 should address this entirely? Why would we need
that other symbol?
We don't. I wasn't aware that 6fc3a8636a7b exists and had this one in my tree
prior to 6.0.
(well... technically we do need those other symbols and don't need VIRTIO, but
since CONFIG_UML_PCI_OVER_VIRTIO pull in those two, it also works).
Since docs were not updated, I didn't see any conflicts when rebasing.

Sorry for the noise, please ignore this patch.

-Michał
Maxime
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help