Thread (47 messages) 47 messages, 13 authors, 2022-07-13

Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] mfd: mt6370: Add Mediatek MT6370 support

From: Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-28 11:53:17
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-iio, linux-leds, linux-mediatek, linux-pm, linux-usb, lkml

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:19 PM ChiaEn Wu [off-list ref] wrote:
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] 於 2022年6月24日 週五 凌晨2:01寫道:
quoted
On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 1:59 PM ChiaEn Wu [off-list ref] wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_BXTWC)  += intel_soc_pmic_bxtwc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTWC)     += intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_CHTDC_TI)  += intel_soc_pmic_chtdc_ti.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MT6360)       += mt6360-core.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MT6370)       += mt6370.o
 mt6397-objs                    := mt6397-core.o mt6397-irq.o mt6358-irq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MT6397)       += mt6397.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SOC_PMIC_MRFLD)     += intel_soc_pmic_mrfld.o
This whole bunch of drivers is in the wrong place in Makefile.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220616182524.7956-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/ (local)
hmm... So shall we need to cherry-pick your this patch first,
then modify the Makefile before the next submission??
I don't know what Lee's preferences are, but at least I have these
options in mind:
1) wait until Lee applies my series;
2) take that single patch to your tree as a precursor.

In the second case you will need to send the series with that patch as well.

...
quoted
quoted
+#define MT6370_REG_MAXADDR     0x1FF
Wondering if (BIT(10) - 1) gives a better hint on how hardware limits
this (so it will be clear it's 10-bit address).
well... This "0x1FF" is just a virtual mapping value to map the max
address of the PMU bank(0x1XX).
So, I feel its means is different from using (BIT(10) - 1) here.
Perhaps a comment then?

...
quoted
quoted
+       if (ret < 0)
+               return ret;
+       else if (ret != val_size)
Redundant 'else'.
I'm not quite sure what you mean, so I made the following changes first.
------------------------------------
       if (ret < 0)
              return ret;
       if (ret != val_size)
              return -EIO;
------------------------------------
I don't know if it meets your expectations??
Yes.
quoted
quoted
+               return -EIO;
-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help