Re: [PATCH v9 01/22] dt-bindings: mediatek,dpi: Add DP_INTF compatible
From: Guillaume Ranquet <hidden>
Date: 2022-05-11 12:37:23
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, linux-phy, lkml
On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:57, Maxime Ripard [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi, On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 12:39:06AM +0200, Guillaume Ranquet wrote:quoted
From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com> DP_INTF is similar to DPI but does not have the exact same feature set or register layouts. DP_INTF is the sink of the display pipeline that is connected to the DisplayPort controller and encoder unit. It takes the same clocks as DPI. Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <redacted> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> --- .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml index dd2896a40ff0..2dba80ad3b18 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml@@ -4,16 +4,16 @@ $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.yaml# $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# -title: mediatek DPI Controller Device Tree Bindings +title: mediatek DPI/DP_INTF Controller maintainers: - CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> - Jitao shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com> description: | - The Mediatek DPI function block is a sink of the display subsystem and - provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a parallel - output bus. + The Mediatek DPI and DP_INTF function blocks are a sink of the display + subsystem and provides 8-bit RGB/YUV444 or 8/10/10-bit YUV422 pixel data on a + parallel output bus. properties: compatible:@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties: - mediatek,mt8173-dpi - mediatek,mt8183-dpi - mediatek,mt8192-dpi + - mediatek,mt8195-dpintfIt seems a bit weird to have all instances of DP_INTF with a separator but the compatible doesn't have one? Is there a reason to not use dp-intf?
None that I know of, It was taken as is from the vendor tree. I'll use dp-intf in v10 for the sake of consistency. Thx, Guillaume.
Maxime