Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2021-10-27

Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: cirrusfb: check pixclock to avoid divide by zero

From: George Kennedy <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-25 19:42:46
Also in: dri-devel, lkml


On 10/25/2021 3:07 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 02:01:30PM -0500, George Kennedy wrote:
quoted
Do a sanity check on pixclock value before using it as a divisor.

Syzkaller reported a divide error in cirrusfb_check_pixclock.

divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 14938 Comm: cirrusfb_test Not tainted 5.15.0-rc6 #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2
RIP: 0010:cirrusfb_check_var+0x6f1/0x1260

Call Trace:
  fb_set_var+0x398/0xf90
  do_fb_ioctl+0x4b8/0x6f0
  fb_ioctl+0xeb/0x130
  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x19d/0x220
  do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

Signed-off-by: George Kennedy <redacted>
---
  drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
index 93802ab..099ddcb 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c
@@ -477,6 +477,9 @@ static int cirrusfb_check_pixclock(const struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
  	struct cirrusfb_info *cinfo = info->par;
  	unsigned maxclockidx = var->bits_per_pixel >> 3;
  
+	if (!var->pixclock)
+		return -EINVAL;
Shouldn't you be checking further up the call chain where this got set
to 0?
The same pixclock check is done in these fb drivers:

arch/arm/mach-rpc/include/mach/acornfb.h:    if (!var->pixclock)
drivers/video/fbdev/asiliantfb.c:    if (!var->pixclock)
drivers/video/fbdev/clps711x-fb.c:    if (!var->pixclock)
drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.c:    if (!var->pixclock)
drivers/video/fbdev/core/modedb.c:    if (!var->pixclock)
drivers/video/fbdev/cirrusfb.c:    if (!var->pixclock)
drivers/video/fbdev/kyro/fbdev.c:    if (!var->pixclock)
drivers/video/fbdev/riva/fbdev.c:    if (!var->pixclock)
drivers/video/fbdev/uvesafb.c:    if (!var->pixclock)
What logic allows this to be a valid value?  What about all other fb
drivers?
The "check_var" function, which is set into the ".fb_check_var" element 
of the fb_ops struct, should do the check, but in the case of cirrusfb, 
that is not being done.

All this patch does is add the same pixclock check that the other above 
fb drivers do.

BTW, this patch should also go into stable (specifically, 5.4.y).

Thank you,
George
thanks,

greg k-h
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help