On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 07:17:13PM -0800, Yu Jiahua wrote:
From: Jiahua Yu <redacted>
spinlock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_SPINLOCK()
rather than explicitly calling spin_lock_init().
Signed-off-by: Jiahua Yu <redacted>
Stuffed into drm-misc-next. The subject looked a bit strange, so I fixed
that up.
-Daniel
quoted hunk
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c
index c71021091828..acca991c7540 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/apply.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static struct {
} dss_data;
/* protects dss_data */
-static spinlock_t data_lock;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(data_lock);
/* lock for blocking functions */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(apply_lock);
static DECLARE_COMPLETION(extra_updated_completion);@@ -131,8 +131,6 @@ static void apply_init_priv(void)
struct mgr_priv_data *mp;
int i;
- spin_lock_init(&data_lock);
-
for (i = 0; i < num_ovls; ++i) {
struct ovl_priv_data *op;
--
2.17.1
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch