backlight: qcom-wled: Correct the sync_toggle sequence

Started by Kiran Gunda on Feb 24, 2021 · 3 messages from 2 authors · Last reply Feb 26, 2021

Subsystems (4)

Show 1 more

Maintainers (5)

Show 1 more
STALE2084d SUPERSEDED

Status: Superseded by v5 (posted 2021-03-18). [go to v5]

Revision v1 (5 revisions archived).

Revisions (5)
  1. v1 current re-posted current
  2. v2 [diff against previous]
  3. v3 [diff against previous]
  4. v4 [diff against previous]
  5. v5 [diff against previous]

open the first message on its own page

Message details and related content
Currently the FSC SYNC_BIT and MOD_SYNC_BIT are toggled
from 1 to 0 to update the FSC and brightenss settings.
Change this sequence form 0 to 1 as per the hardware team
recommendation to update the FSC and brightness correctly.

Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
index aef52b9..19f83ac 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
@@ -337,13 +337,13 @@ static int wled3_sync_toggle(struct wled *wled)
 
 	rc = regmap_update_bits(wled->regmap,
 				wled->ctrl_addr + WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC,
-				mask, mask);
+				mask, WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC_CLEAR);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		return rc;
 
 	rc = regmap_update_bits(wled->regmap,
 				wled->ctrl_addr + WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC,
-				mask, WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC_CLEAR);
+				mask, mask);
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -353,17 +353,17 @@ static int wled5_mod_sync_toggle(struct wled *wled)
 	int rc;
 	u8 val;
 
-	val = (wled->cfg.mod_sel == MOD_A) ? WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MOD_A_BIT :
-					     WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MOD_B_BIT;
 	rc = regmap_update_bits(wled->regmap,
 				wled->sink_addr + WLED5_SINK_REG_MOD_SYNC_BIT,
-				WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MASK, val);
+				WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MASK, 0);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		return rc;
 
+	val = (wled->cfg.mod_sel == MOD_A) ? WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MOD_A_BIT :
+					     WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MOD_B_BIT;
 	return regmap_update_bits(wled->regmap,
 				  wled->sink_addr + WLED5_SINK_REG_MOD_SYNC_BIT,
-				  WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MASK, 0);
+				  WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MASK, val);
 }
 
 static int wled_ovp_fault_status(struct wled *wled, bool *fault_set)
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
 a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Message details and related content
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 09:20:48AM +0530, Kiran Gunda wrote:
Currently the FSC SYNC_BIT and MOD_SYNC_BIT are toggled
from 1 to 0 to update the FSC and brightenss settings.
Change this sequence form 0 to 1 as per the hardware team
recommendation to update the FSC and brightness correctly.
Again... this patch description feels somewhat rushed. A patch
description is there to support code reviewer and to go on the version
history to assist with future maintainance. They matter!

Anyhow I don't recognise the "from 1 to 0" in the code since both before
an after the change it goes "from 0 to 1" and "from 1 to 0" but in a
different order. Doesn't the code actually currently implement "set then
clear"? If so then, likewise the new code is adopting "clear then set".

As with patch 1, the sync bits modified by wled3_sync_toggle singular
or plural?

Finally a description that is more sympathetic to the reviewer would be
welcome.  For example the following (if my guess is right and it is
true) makes things much easier for the reviewer:

  "The sync takes place during a 0 to 1 transition of the sync
  bits so the hardware team recommends a clear-then-set approach in
  order to guarantee such a transition regardless of the previous
  register state".
 

Daniel.

quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
index aef52b9..19f83ac 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
@@ -337,13 +337,13 @@ static int wled3_sync_toggle(struct wled *wled)
 
 	rc = regmap_update_bits(wled->regmap,
 				wled->ctrl_addr + WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC,
-				mask, mask);
+				mask, WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC_CLEAR);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		return rc;
 
 	rc = regmap_update_bits(wled->regmap,
 				wled->ctrl_addr + WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC,
-				mask, WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC_CLEAR);
+				mask, mask);
 
 	return rc;
 }
@@ -353,17 +353,17 @@ static int wled5_mod_sync_toggle(struct wled *wled)
 	int rc;
 	u8 val;
 
-	val = (wled->cfg.mod_sel == MOD_A) ? WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MOD_A_BIT :
-					     WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MOD_B_BIT;
 	rc = regmap_update_bits(wled->regmap,
 				wled->sink_addr + WLED5_SINK_REG_MOD_SYNC_BIT,
-				WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MASK, val);
+				WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MASK, 0);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		return rc;
 
+	val = (wled->cfg.mod_sel == MOD_A) ? WLED5_SINK_REG_SYNC_MOD_A_BIT :

12 more quoted lines

Message details and related content
On 2021-02-24 16:56, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 09:20:48AM +0530, Kiran Gunda wrote:
quoted
Currently the FSC SYNC_BIT and MOD_SYNC_BIT are toggled
from 1 to 0 to update the FSC and brightenss settings.
Change this sequence form 0 to 1 as per the hardware team
recommendation to update the FSC and brightness correctly.
Again... this patch description feels somewhat rushed. A patch
description is there to support code reviewer and to go on the version
history to assist with future maintainance. They matter!

Anyhow I don't recognise the "from 1 to 0" in the code since both before
an after the change it goes "from 0 to 1" and "from 1 to 0" but in a
different order. Doesn't the code actually currently implement "set then
clear"? If so then, likewise the new code is adopting "clear then set".
I would have used "set" and "clear" instead of "0" and "1".
Yes. The current code implementation is "set" all SYN bits and then "clear"
all SYNC bits. The new code is modified to change the sequence from "clear"
first and then "set" to ensure both FSC and brightness are updated.
As with patch 1, the sync bits modified by wled3_sync_toggle singular
or plural?
It is plural. We have to "clear" and "set" all sync bits.
Finally a description that is more sympathetic to the reviewer would be
welcome.  For example the following (if my guess is right and it is
true) makes things much easier for the reviewer:
Sure. I will update the documentation and patch description clearly.
  "The sync takes place during a 0 to 1 transition of the sync
  bits so the hardware team recommends a clear-then-set approach in
  order to guarantee such a transition regardless of the previous
  register state".


Daniel.

quoted
Signed-off-by: Kiran Gunda <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
index aef52b9..19f83ac 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c
@@ -337,13 +337,13 @@ static int wled3_sync_toggle(struct wled *wled)

 	rc = regmap_update_bits(wled->regmap,
 				wled->ctrl_addr + WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC,
-				mask, mask);
+				mask, WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC_CLEAR);
 	if (rc < 0)
 		return rc;

 	rc = regmap_update_bits(wled->regmap,
 				wled->ctrl_addr + WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC,
-				mask, WLED3_SINK_REG_SYNC_CLEAR);
+				mask, mask);

 	return rc;
 }

26 more quoted lines

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help