Hi Rob,

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 04:11:48PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:25 AM Brian Masney [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Add new backlight bindings for the TI LM3630A dual-string white LED.

Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
Changes since v5:
- Change 'lm3630a_bl@38' in examples to 'led-controller@38'

Changes since v4:
- Drop $ref from led-sources
- Drop description from reg of i2c address
- Expand description of reg for the control bank
- Drop status from examples

Changes since v3:
- Add label. I didn't add a description for it since that'll come from
  the common properties once its converted.

Changes since v2:
- Update description of max-brightness
- Add description for reg
- Correct typo: s/tranisiton/transition
- add reg to control banks
- add additionalProperties

 .../leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.yaml     | 129 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.yaml

I'm working on getting the examples to be validated by the schema (in
addition to just building with dtc) and there's a couple of errors:

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.example.dt.yaml:
'#address-cells', '#size-cells' do not match any of the regexes:
'^led@[01]$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.example.dt.yaml:
'#address-cells', '#size-cells' do not match any of the regexes:
'^led@[01]$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

You didn't list '#address-cells' and '#size-cells'.

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.example.dt.yaml:
led@0: 'ti,linear-mapping-mode' does not match any of the regexes:
'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/lm3630a-backlight.example.dt.yaml:
led@1: 'ti,linear-mapping-mode' does not match any of the regexes:
'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

'ti,linear-mapping-mode' is not defined in the child nodes.

I'm sorry about that. I'll send out a patch this weekend to correct
this. I have 'make dt_binding_check' in my local build script. Is there
something else that I should be running as well? Or do you have a
branch somewhere with your validation work that I can test my changes
against?

Brian