quoted

quoted

On 02/12/2019 09:42 AM, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Fri, 08 Feb 2019, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

quoted

On 01/17/2019 05:19 PM, Daniel Thompson wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:33:35PM +0300, Alexander Shiyan wrote:

quoted

We have two *_CLASS_DEVICE kernel config options (LCD_CLASS_DEVICE
and BACKLIGHT_LCD_DEVICE) that do the same job.
The patch removes useless BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT option
and converts LCD_CLASS_DEVICE into a menu.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <redacted>

A cover letter with the v1 -> v2 changelog would be nice... but
nevertheless:
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>

Also:

Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <redacted>

Lee, will you pick this up or do you want me to do it?

You can take them if you want.  I will require a pull-request from an
independent immutable branch though please.

OK, immutable branch will also allow other trees (drm) to sync with
these changes if desired.

I will do it for v5.2 if you are fine with it (too late for v5.1
IMHO and I also won't have time too fix any potential issues next
week).

quoted

Topic branch for these 2 simple patches seems like serious overkill.

[...]

quoted

Would be good to get it into 5.1 still though, just to avoid too
many conflicts. 

I think you just answered your own statement. :)

Well, if so I'm also fine with this going in 5.1 w/o topic branch.

Lee, do you want to merge this directly into backlight tree (you
have now both fbdev and drm acks)?

It was too late for v5.1.

Do you still want to take this for v5.2, or should I take them and
provide you with an immutable pull-request?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog