On Tue, 24 Apr 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:12:57AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Simon Horman wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

The documentation was wrong, gpiod_get_direction() returns 0/1 instead
of the GPIOF_* flags. The docs were fixed with commit 94fc73094abe47
("gpio: correct docs about return value of gpiod_get_direction"). Now,
fix this user (until a better, system-wide solution is in place).

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <redacted>

Thanks for the Reviewed-by Simon.  I have applied it to the original mail.

Do you know why you mail wasn't sent attached to the original thread?
For some reason I received this mail on it's own i.e. not in reply
to the original.

No, not off hand. Perhaps I responded to the email in some unusual way
but by now I don't recall. In any case I'll try to be more careful
in future.

I see Lee is using gmail for sending, so I assume also for receiving.

Well I'm using their servers, but my set-up is IMAP/Mutt.

While I did receive Simon's reply in-thread, lately I had issues with gmail
not always doing so, and sometimes failing to do deduplication when receiving
email through multiple paths (mailing lists and/or directly).

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog