On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
This removes the of_compatible for the backlight sub-device. There
will be no extra sub-node for the backlight.
Won't doing this in a separate patch break bisectability?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <redacted>
---
drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
index 2ee09d099832..de76298cf3a8 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3532_devices[] = {
{
.name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
.id = LM3532,
- .of_compatible = "ti,lm3532-backlight",
},
};
@@ -78,7 +77,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3631_devices[] = {
{
.name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
.id = LM3631,
- .of_compatible = "ti,lm3631-backlight",
},
};
@@ -89,7 +87,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3632_devices[] = {
{
.name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
.id = LM3632,
- .of_compatible = "ti,lm3632-backlight",
},
};
@@ -97,7 +94,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3633_devices[] = {
{
.name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
.id = LM3633,
- .of_compatible = "ti,lm3633-backlight",
},
{
.name = "lm3633-leds",@@ -115,7 +111,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3695_devices[] = {
{
.name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
.id = LM3695,
- .of_compatible = "ti,lm3695-backlight",
},
};
@@ -123,7 +118,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3697_devices[] = {
{
.name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
.id = LM3697,
- .of_compatible = "ti,lm3697-backlight",
},
/* Monitoring driver for open/short circuit detection */
{
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog