On Tue, 30 Jan 2018, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:

Hi,

2017-12-01 13:06 GMT+01:00 Enric Balletbo i Serra [off-list ref]:

quoted

Before this patch the enable signal was set before the PWM signal and
vice-versa on power off. This sequence is wrong, at least, it is on
the different panels datasheets that I checked, so I inverted the sequence
to follow the specs.

For reference the following panels have the mentioned sequence:
  - N133HSE-EA1 (Innolux)
  - N116BGE (Innolux)
  - N156BGE-L21 (Innolux)
  - B101EAN0 (Auo)
  - B101AW03 (Auo)
  - LTN101NT05 (Samsung)
  - CLAA101WA01A (Chunghwa)

Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <redacted>
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
---
Changes since v4:
 - Rebase on top of mainline.
 - Add the acks from Daniel Thompson and Jingoo Han.
Changes since v3:
 - List the part numbers for the panel checked (Daniel Thompson)
Changes since v2:
 - Add this as a separate patch (Thierry Reding)
Changes since v1:
 - None

 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

A gentle ping, It's been nearly two months since I sent this patchset,
there is anything else that prevents these patches to land or
incorporate in linux-next?

Looks like Daniel should Ack 2/5 since he had comments on it before
and it still lacks a Backlight Ack.

With regards to -next, the merge-window is open (should close in a
little over a week), so the chances are, you'll get a long soak before
the next merge-window opens.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog