Re: [PATCH v3] Fix loading of module radeonfb on PowerMac
From: Mathieu Malaterre <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-30 13:14:34
Also in:
dri-devel, lkml
Bartlomiej, On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thursday, December 21, 2017 11:07:56 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:quoted
When the linux kernel is build with (typical kernel ship with Debian installer): CONFIG_FB_OF=y CONFIG_VT_HW_CONSOLE_BINDING=y CONFIG_FB_RADEON=m The offb driver takes precedence over module radeonfb. It is then impossible to load the module, error reported is: [ 96.551486] radeonfb 0000:00:10.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007) [ 96.551526] radeonfb 0000:00:10.0: BAR 0: can't reserve [mem 0x98000000-0x9fffffff pref] [ 96.551531] radeonfb (0000:00:10.0): cannot request region 0. [ 96.551545] radeonfb: probe of 0000:00:10.0 failed with error -16 This patch reproduce the behavior of the module radeon, so as to make it possible to load radeonfb when offb is first loaded. It should be noticed that `offb_destroy` is never called which explain the need to skip error detection on the radeon side.This still needs to be explained more, from my last mail: "The last put_fb_info() on fb_info should call ->fb_destroy (offb_destroy in our case) and remove_conflicting_framebuffers() is calling put_fb_info() so there is some extra reference on fb_info somewhere preventing it from going away. Please look into fixing this."
I am not familiar with the fb stuff internals but here is what I see: # modprobe radeonfb leads to: [ 52.058546] bus: 'pci': add driver radeonfb [ 52.058588] bus: 'pci': driver_probe_device: matched device 0000:00:10.0 with driver radeonfb [ 52.058595] bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver radeonfb with device 0000:00:10.0 [ 52.058608] devices_kset: Moving 0000:00:10.0 to end of list [ 52.058613] radeonfb_pci_register BEGIN [ 52.058634] radeonfb 0000:00:10.0: enabling device (0006 -> 0007) <at this point radeon_kick_out_firmware_fb is called> [ 52.058666] checking generic (9c008000 96000) vs hw (98000000 8000000) [ 52.058667] fb: switching to radeonfb from OFfb ATY,RockHo [ 52.058844] Console: switching to colour dummy device 80x25 [ 52.058860] device: 'fb0': device_unregister [ 52.058956] PM: Removing info for No Bus:fb0 [ 52.059014] device: 'fb0': device_create_release <a call to do_unregister_framebuffer is done> <put_fb_info is done with a count=2 and dev=NULL> [ 52.059048] device: 'vtcon1': device_unregister [ 52.059076] PM: Removing info for No Bus:vtcon1 [ 52.059091] device: 'vtcon1': device_create_release [ 52.059107] radeonfb 0000:00:10.0: BAR 0: can't reserve [mem 0x98000000-0x9fffffff pref] [ 52.256151] aper_base: 98000000 MC_FB_LOC to: 9bff9800, MC_AGP_LOC to: ffffa000 [ 52.256157] radeonfb (0000:00:10.0): Found 32768k of DDR 64 bits wide videoram I can confirm that offb_destroy is never called (not sure exactly why), but in any case the call to radeon_kick_out_firmware_fb happen much earlier, at least before the put_fb_info. Could you describe a bit more the chain of calls you were thinking of ?
quoted
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <redacted> Link: https://bugs.debian.org/826629#57 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id9741 Suggested-by: Lennart Sorensen <redacted> --- v2: Only fails when CONFIG_PCC is not set v3: Only fails when CONFIG_FB_OF is not set, CONFIG_PCC was too broad. Since the conflicts in region is due to OFfb explicitly refers to it.It seems that there may still be configurations when this is incorrect -> when offb drives primary (non-radeon) card and radeonfb drives secondary (radeon) card..quoted
drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c index 4d77daeecf99..221879196531 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/aty/radeon_base.c@@ -2259,6 +2259,22 @@ static const struct bin_attribute edid2_attr = { .read = radeon_show_edid2, }; +static int radeon_kick_out_firmware_fb(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ + struct apertures_struct *ap; + + ap = alloc_apertures(1); + if (!ap) + return -ENOMEM; + + ap->ranges[0].base = pci_resource_start(pdev, 0); + ap->ranges[0].size = pci_resource_len(pdev, 0); + + remove_conflicting_framebuffers(ap, KBUILD_MODNAME, false); + kfree(ap); + + return 0; +} static int radeonfb_pci_register(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)@@ -2312,19 +2328,27 @@ static int radeonfb_pci_register(struct pci_dev *pdev, rinfo->fb_base_phys = pci_resource_start (pdev, 0); rinfo->mmio_base_phys = pci_resource_start (pdev, 2); + ret = radeon_kick_out_firmware_fb(pdev); + if (ret) + return ret; + /* request the mem regions */ ret = pci_request_region(pdev, 0, "radeonfb framebuffer"); if (ret < 0) { +#ifndef CONFIG_FB_OF printk( KERN_ERR "radeonfb (%s): cannot request region 0.\n", pci_name(rinfo->pdev)); goto err_release_fb; +#endif } ret = pci_request_region(pdev, 2, "radeonfb mmio"); if (ret < 0) { +#ifndef CONFIG_FB_OF printk( KERN_ERR "radeonfb (%s): cannot request region 2.\n", pci_name(rinfo->pdev)); goto err_release_pci0; +#endif } /* map the regions */@@ -2509,10 +2533,12 @@ static int radeonfb_pci_register(struct pci_dev *pdev, iounmap(rinfo->mmio_base); err_release_pci2: pci_release_region(pdev, 2); +#ifndef CONFIG_FB_OF err_release_pci0: pci_release_region(pdev, 0); err_release_fb: framebuffer_release(info); +#endif err_disable: err_out: return ret;Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
Thanks, -M