From: Peter Malone <hidden> Date: 2018-01-31 14:57:55
Fixing arbitrary kernel leak in case FBIOGETCMAP_SPARC in
sbusfb_ioctl_helper().
'index' is defined as an int in sbusfb_ioctl_helper().
We retrieve this from the user:
if (get_user(index, &c->index) ||
__get_user(count, &c->count) ||
__get_user(ured, &c->red) ||
__get_user(ugreen, &c->green) ||
__get_user(ublue, &c->blue))
return -EFAULT;
and then we use 'index' in the following way:
red = cmap->red[index + i] >> 8;
green = cmap->green[index + i] >> 8;
blue = cmap->blue[index + i] >> 8;
This is a classic information leak vulnerability. 'index' should be
an unsigned int, given its usage above.
This patch is straight-forward; it changes 'index' to unsigned int
in two switch-cases: FBIOGETCMAP_SPARC && FBIOPUTCMAP_SPARC.
Signed-off-by: Peter Malone <redacted>
---
v2: fixed formatting
drivers/video/fbdev/sbuslib.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int sbusfb_ioctl_helper(unsigned long cmd, unsigned long arg,unsignedchar__user*ured;unsignedchar__user*ugreen;unsignedchar__user*ublue;-intindex,count,i;+unsignedintindex,count,i;if(get_user(index,&c->index)||__get_user(count,&c->count)||
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ int sbusfb_ioctl_helper(unsigned long cmd, unsigned long arg,unsignedchar__user*ugreen;unsignedchar__user*ublue;structfb_cmap*cmap=&info->cmap;-intindex,count,i;+unsignedintindex,count,i;u8red,green,blue;if(get_user(index,&c->index)||
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Peter Malone [off-list ref] wrote:
Fixing arbitrary kernel leak in case FBIOGETCMAP_SPARC in
sbusfb_ioctl_helper().
'index' is defined as an int in sbusfb_ioctl_helper().
We retrieve this from the user:
if (get_user(index, &c->index) ||
__get_user(count, &c->count) ||
__get_user(ured, &c->red) ||
__get_user(ugreen, &c->green) ||
__get_user(ublue, &c->blue))
return -EFAULT;
and then we use 'index' in the following way:
red = cmap->red[index + i] >> 8;
green = cmap->green[index + i] >> 8;
blue = cmap->blue[index + i] >> 8;
This is a classic information leak vulnerability. 'index' should be
an unsigned int, given its usage above.
This patch is straight-forward; it changes 'index' to unsigned int
in two switch-cases: FBIOGETCMAP_SPARC && FBIOPUTCMAP_SPARC.
Signed-off-by: Peter Malone <redacted>
---
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int sbusfb_ioctl_helper(unsigned long cmd, unsigned long arg,unsignedchar__user*ured;unsignedchar__user*ugreen;unsignedchar__user*ublue;-intindex,count,i;+unsignedintindex,count,i;if(get_user(index,&c->index)||__get_user(count,&c->count)||
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ int sbusfb_ioctl_helper(unsigned long cmd, unsigned long arg,unsignedchar__user*ugreen;unsignedchar__user*ublue;structfb_cmap*cmap=&info->cmap;-intindex,count,i;+unsignedintindex,count,i;u8red,green,blue;if(get_user(index,&c->index)||--
2.14.3
By just looking at the code and commit message:
Acked-by: Mathieu Malaterre <redacted>
From: Peter Malone <hidden> Date: 2018-02-04 14:18:12
Hi folks,
CVE-2018-6412 has been created for this. Is it possible for you to add
a note indicating the CVE number when merging the patch?
I received the CVE number after the patch was created and ack'd, which
is why I didn't include it in the commit message.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Mathieu Malaterre [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Peter Malone [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Fixing arbitrary kernel leak in case FBIOGETCMAP_SPARC in
sbusfb_ioctl_helper().
'index' is defined as an int in sbusfb_ioctl_helper().
We retrieve this from the user:
if (get_user(index, &c->index) ||
__get_user(count, &c->count) ||
__get_user(ured, &c->red) ||
__get_user(ugreen, &c->green) ||
__get_user(ublue, &c->blue))
return -EFAULT;
and then we use 'index' in the following way:
red = cmap->red[index + i] >> 8;
green = cmap->green[index + i] >> 8;
blue = cmap->blue[index + i] >> 8;
This is a classic information leak vulnerability. 'index' should be
an unsigned int, given its usage above.
This patch is straight-forward; it changes 'index' to unsigned int
in two switch-cases: FBIOGETCMAP_SPARC && FBIOPUTCMAP_SPARC.
Signed-off-by: Peter Malone <redacted>
---
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int sbusfb_ioctl_helper(unsigned long cmd, unsigned long arg,unsignedchar__user*ured;unsignedchar__user*ugreen;unsignedchar__user*ublue;-intindex,count,i;+unsignedintindex,count,i;if(get_user(index,&c->index)||__get_user(count,&c->count)||
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ int sbusfb_ioctl_helper(unsigned long cmd, unsigned long arg,unsignedchar__user*ugreen;unsignedchar__user*ublue;structfb_cmap*cmap=&info->cmap;-intindex,count,i;+unsignedintindex,count,i;u8red,green,blue;if(get_user(index,&c->index)||--
2.14.3
By just looking at the code and commit message:
Acked-by: Mathieu Malaterre <redacted>
On Sunday, February 04, 2018 09:18:03 AM Peter Malone wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi,
CVE-2018-6412 has been created for this. Is it possible for you to add
a note indicating the CVE number when merging the patch?
I received the CVE number after the patch was created and ack'd, which
is why I didn't include it in the commit message.
I queued the patch (with Mathieu's ACK and CVE number added to the patch
description) for v4.16, thanks.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Mathieu Malaterre [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:57 PM, Peter Malone [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Fixing arbitrary kernel leak in case FBIOGETCMAP_SPARC in
sbusfb_ioctl_helper().
'index' is defined as an int in sbusfb_ioctl_helper().
We retrieve this from the user:
if (get_user(index, &c->index) ||
__get_user(count, &c->count) ||
__get_user(ured, &c->red) ||
__get_user(ugreen, &c->green) ||
__get_user(ublue, &c->blue))
return -EFAULT;
and then we use 'index' in the following way:
red = cmap->red[index + i] >> 8;
green = cmap->green[index + i] >> 8;
blue = cmap->blue[index + i] >> 8;
This is a classic information leak vulnerability. 'index' should be
an unsigned int, given its usage above.
This patch is straight-forward; it changes 'index' to unsigned int
in two switch-cases: FBIOGETCMAP_SPARC && FBIOPUTCMAP_SPARC.
Signed-off-by: Peter Malone <redacted>
---
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int sbusfb_ioctl_helper(unsigned long cmd, unsigned long arg,unsignedchar__user*ured;unsignedchar__user*ugreen;unsignedchar__user*ublue;-intindex,count,i;+unsignedintindex,count,i;if(get_user(index,&c->index)||__get_user(count,&c->count)||
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ int sbusfb_ioctl_helper(unsigned long cmd, unsigned long arg,unsignedchar__user*ugreen;unsignedchar__user*ublue;structfb_cmap*cmap=&info->cmap;-intindex,count,i;+unsignedintindex,count,i;u8red,green,blue;if(get_user(index,&c->index)||--
2.14.3
By just looking at the code and commit message:
Acked-by: Mathieu Malaterre <redacted>
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics