Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] pwm-backlight: add support for PWM delays proprieties.
From: Enric Balletbo Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-12-01 10:39:44
Also in:
linux-pwm, linux-rockchip, lkml
Hi, 2017-07-26 19:01 GMT+02:00 Jingoo Han [off-list ref]:
On Monday, July 24, 2017 11:22 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:quoted
On 21/07/17 11:48, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:quoted
Some panels (i.e. N116BGE-L41), in their power sequence specifications, request a delay between set the PWM signal and enable the backlight and between clear the PWM signal and disable the backlight. Add support for the new post-pwm-on-delay-ms and pwm-off-delay-ms proprieties to meet the timings. Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <redacted>Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <redacted>Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
A lot of time has passed since these patches received the acks but I'm still without seeing the patches in linux-next. There is some action I need to do ? (rebase?). I'd really like to see those to land in next merge window if all is ok. Thanks, Enric
Best regards, Jingoo Hanquoted
quoted
--- Changes since v3: - Use two named members instead of pwm_delay[] (Daniel and Pavel) - Use msleep instead of usleep_range. (Pavel) Changes since v2: - Move the pwm/enable sequence to another patch (Thierry Reding) Changes since v1: - As suggested by Daniel Thompson - Do not assume power-on delay and power-off delay will be the same - Move the check of dt property to the parse dt function. drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/pwm_backlight.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.cb/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.cquoted
index 909a686..6cf6109 100644--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ * published by the Free Software Foundation. */ +#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> #include <linux/gpio.h> #include <linux/module.h>@@ -35,6 +36,8 @@ struct pwm_bl_data { struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio; unsigned int scale; bool legacy; + unsigned int post_pwm_on_delay; + unsigned int pwm_off_delay; int (*notify)(struct device *, int brightness); void (*notify_after)(struct device *,@@ -56,6 +59,9 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_on(struct pwm_bl_data*pb, int brightness)quoted
pwm_enable(pb->pwm); + if (pb->post_pwm_on_delay) + msleep(pb->post_pwm_on_delay); + if (pb->enable_gpio) gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 1);@@ -70,6 +76,9 @@ static void pwm_backlight_power_off(struct pwm_bl_data*pb)quoted
if (pb->enable_gpio) gpiod_set_value_cansleep(pb->enable_gpio, 0); + if (pb->pwm_off_delay) + msleep(pb->pwm_off_delay); + pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period); pwm_disable(pb->pwm);@@ -175,6 +184,14 @@ static int pwm_backlight_parse_dt(struct device*dev,quoted
data->max_brightness--; } + /* + * These values are optional and set as 0 by default, the outvaluesquoted
+ * are modified only if a valid u32 value can be decoded. + */ + of_property_read_u32(node, "post-pwm-on-delay-ms", + &data->post_pwm_on_delay); + of_property_read_u32(node, "pwm-off-delay-ms", &data- pwm_off_delay); + data->enable_gpio = -EINVAL; return 0; }@@ -273,6 +290,8 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(structplatform_device *pdev)quoted
pb->exit = data->exit; pb->dev = &pdev->dev; pb->enabled = false; + pb->post_pwm_on_delay = data->post_pwm_on_delay; + pb->pwm_off_delay = data->pwm_off_delay; pb->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "enable", GPIOD_ASIS);diff --git a/include/linux/pwm_backlight.hb/include/linux/pwm_backlight.hquoted
index efdd922..62f59c4 100644--- a/include/linux/pwm_backlight.h +++ b/include/linux/pwm_backlight.h@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ struct platform_pwm_backlight_data { unsigned int lth_brightness; unsigned int pwm_period_ns; unsigned int *levels; + unsigned int post_pwm_on_delay; + unsigned int pwm_off_delay; /* TODO remove once all users are switched to gpiod_* API */ int enable_gpio; int (*init)(struct device *dev);