Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 5 authors, 2017-12-01

Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] omapdrm: panel: fix compatible vendor string for td028ttec1

flat view

From: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hidden>
Date: 2017-12-01 07:46:43
Also in: dri-devel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml

Am 01.12.2017 um 02:57 schrieb Rob Herring [off-list ref]:

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:48:54PM +0100, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
quoted
The vendor name was "toppoly" but other panels and the vendor list
have defined it as "tpo". So let's fix it in driver and bindings.

We keep the old definition in parallel to stay compatible with
potential older DTB setup.

Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <redacted>
---
.../display/panel/{toppoly,td028ttec1.txt => tpo,td028ttec1.txt}      | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c               | 3 +++
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c      | 3 +++
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/{toppoly,td028ttec1.txt => tpo,td028ttec1.txt} (84%)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/toppoly,td028ttec1.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/tpo,td028ttec1.txt
similarity index 84%
rename from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/toppoly,td028ttec1.txt
rename to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/tpo,td028ttec1.txt
index 7175dc3740ac..ed34253d9fb1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/toppoly,td028ttec1.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/tpo,td028ttec1.txt
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Toppoly TD028TTEC1 Panel
========================

Required properties:
-- compatible: "toppoly,td028ttec1"
+- compatible: "tpo,td028ttec1"

Optional properties:
- label: a symbolic name for the panel
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Example
-------
lcd-panel: td028ttec1@0 {
-	compatible = "toppoly,td028ttec1";
+	compatible = "tpo,td028ttec1";
	reg = <0>;
	spi-max-frequency = <100000>;
	spi-cpol;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
index 0a38a0e8c925..a0dfa14f4fab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c
@@ -452,6 +452,8 @@ static int td028ttec1_panel_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
}

static const struct of_device_id td028ttec1_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "omapdss,tpo,td028ttec1", },
Why the omapdss part?
I think because they are (currently and still) omapdrm
(omapdss) specific since SoC specific drivers for the
same panel may exist in parallel.

All panel drivers in drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays
have and need this prefix.

As far as I understand, the omapdss driver takes the
DTS compatible string, adds "omapdss," and then looks for
a panel driver to probe.

See also: Sebastian Reichel's comment to "[PATCH v3 4/4] DTS: Pandora: fix panel compatibility string"

BR,
Nikolaus Schaller
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help