On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Frans Klaver [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 7:45 AM, AbdAllah-MEZITI
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This patch
- will always take the lock
Why?
"The current code only takes the lock if multiple instances are in use.
This is error-prone, and confuses static analyzers.
As taking the lock in case of a single instance is harmful and cheap,
change the code to always take the lock."
I would argue that it's not harmful, lest people get confused about
Sorry, I meant "harmless". I should start caring as much for commit
messages I write for other people as for those I write for myself ;-)
it. And I agree that this explanation is much more useful than just
mentioning the warnings that you saw.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds