Re: [PATCH 0/3] multiple checkpatch issues

[PATCH 0/3] multiple checkpatch issues · Arushi Singhal <hidden> · 2017-03-10
[PATCH 1/3] staging: sm750fb: function prototype argument should have an identifier name · Arushi Singhal <hidden> · 2017-03-10
[PATCH 2/3] staging: sm750fb: fixes add blank line after function/struct/union/enum declarations · Arushi Singhal <hidden> · 2017-03-10
[PATCH 3/3] staging: sm750fb: Alignment should match open parenthesis · Arushi Singhal <hidden> · 2017-03-10
Re: [PATCH 0/3] multiple checkpatch issues · Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> · 2017-03-10

From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2017-03-10 22:05:54
Also in: lkml

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 03:26:54AM +0530, Arushi Singhal wrote:

Improve readability by fixing multiple checkpatch.pl
issues in sm750fb driver.

Note, _PLEASE_ put the subsystem/driver name in this 0/X email subject
line, like your patches have them.  It makes it easier when I sort
patches by driver/subsystem when reviewing them.  As it is, I end up
always ignoring these 0/X emails.

thanks,

greg k-h

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help