Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 3 authors, 2016-08-17

Re: backlight-tosa: Delete owner assignment

From: Vegard Nossum <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-15 13:37:54
Also in: kernel-janitors, lkml

On 15 August 2016 at 15:25, SF Markus Elfring
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
The field "owner" is set by core. Thus delete an extra initialisation.
Just a small nit on the patch title: "delete owner assignment" is
virtually useless as a title because it has no meaning without the
broader context and only describes the literal change. It's like
naming a patch "add a line" or "change the code";
it serves no purpose.
I have got an other impression.

Do you want that I add any more background information to the
commit message?
No, the rest of the commit message is fine. I was only concerned about
the patch title (the first line) since that's what appears frequently
in patch lists (cgit, shortlogs, email/archives), etc.
quoted
How about "backlight-tosa: delete _unnecessary_ assignment"?
Will the underlined key word trigger any related software
development concerns?
No, the emphasis was just for the email, I wouldn't put that in the
actual commit log.
Would another look be needed on how the usage of the mentioned data
structure element was reduced over time?
No, it's fine, it's really just about the patch title :-) Thanks,


Vegard
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help