On Tue, 02 Aug 2016, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Jani Nikula [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Sedat Dilek [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi,
I see the below call-trace with latest d-i-n, guess latest linux-next
FWIW, "d-i-n" is ambiguous (drm-intel-next vs. drm-intel-nightly) and we
don't use that ourselves.
Oh, sorry with d-i-n I meant drm-intel-nightly.
Normally, I also point to the "integration manifest"
like...drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-08m-02d-14h-10m-12s UTC integration
manifest.
You do not test d-i-n yourself?
Strange.
We do not use the *acronym* "d-i-n" ourselves because it is
ambiguous. drm-intel-nightly is our main test target.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center