Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-07-07

Re: [PATCH] xen-fbfront: correct return value checks on xenbus_scanf()

From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Date: 2016-07-07 09:42:53
Also in: xen-devel

On 07/07/16 09:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
Only a positive return value indicates success.
Hmm, I'm not convinced on this change (and the similar others as
well). From xenbus.h:

/* Single read and scanf: returns -errno or num scanned if > 0. */

There should be no case for xenbus_scanf() returning 0. And looking
into the functions proofs this is correct.


Juergen
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- 4.7-rc6-xenbus_scanf.orig/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
+++ 4.7-rc6-xenbus_scanf/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c
@@ -658,13 +658,13 @@ InitWait:
 			goto InitWait; /* no InitWait seen yet, fudge it */
 
 		if (xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend,
-				 "request-update", "%d", &val) < 0)
+				 "request-update", "%d", &val) <= 0)
 			val = 0;
 		if (val)
 			info->update_wanted = 1;
 
 		if (xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, dev->otherend,
-				 "feature-resize", "%d", &val) < 0)
+				 "feature-resize", "%d", &val) <= 0)
 			val = 0;
 		info->feature_resize = val;
 		break;
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help