On Fri, 20 May 2016, Scot Doyle wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2016, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
quoted
Hi Ming,
quoted
Then looks there are two fix patches acked & tested:
- the patch in this thread
- another one "[PATCH] tty: vt: Fix soft lockup in fbcon cursor
blink timer."
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/17/455
So which one will be pushed to linus?
Not that it's my call, but we may want both; the first as a safety
measure to prevent an invalid cur_blink_jiffies ever being set, and the
second one to actually fix the initialisation of vc_cur_blink_ms (and
address the warning introduced by the first).
Tomi / Greg,
I'd suggest
- applying "tty: vt: Fix soft lockup in fbcon cursor blink timer." to 4.7 and stable[4.2]
- applying "fbcon: warn on invalid cursor blink intervals" to 4.7
- ignoring "fbcon: use default if cursor blink interval is not valid"
Note: the patches don't depend on each other
"tty: vt: Fix soft lockup..." should be applied first in order to avoid
unnecessary reports due to the log warning in "fbcon: warn on invalid..."
quoted
I guess we could just go with the latter for stable...
Cheers,
Jeremy