Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update

[PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 01/12] pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts · Jacek Anaszewski <hidden> · 2015-09-22
Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2015-09-22
Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] pwm: introduce default period and polarity concepts · Alexandre Belloni <hidden> · 2015-11-07
[PATCH v3 02/12] pwm: define a new pwm_state struct · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 07/12] pwm: add the core infrastructure to allow atomic update · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 05/12] pwm: declare a default PWM state · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 06/12] pwm: add the PWM initial state retrieval infra · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 08/12] pwm: add information about polarity, duty cycle and period to debugfs · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 12/12] regulator: pwm: properly initialize the ->state field · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
Re: [PATCH v3 12/12] regulator: pwm: properly initialize the ->state field · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 11/12] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
Re: [PATCH v3 11/12] regulator: pwm: implement ->enable(), ->disable() and ->is_enabled methods · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 10/12] pwm: rockchip: add support for atomic update · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 09/12] pwm: rockchip: add initial state retrieval · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 03/12] pwm: move the enabled/disabled info to pwm_state struct · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
[PATCH v3 04/12] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-09-21
Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] backlight: pwm_bl: remove useless call to pwm_set_period · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2015-09-22
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> · 2015-09-21
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-10-09
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> · 2015-10-19
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Thierry Reding <hidden> · 2015-11-10
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2015-11-10
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-01-25
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Thierry Reding <hidden> · 2016-01-25
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2016-01-25
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-01-25
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Thierry Reding <hidden> · 2016-02-03
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-02-03
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2016-02-04
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2016-02-04
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Thierry Reding <hidden> · 2016-02-23
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-02-22
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Thierry Reding <hidden> · 2016-02-22
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-02-22
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2016-02-22
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-02-23
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Thierry Reding <hidden> · 2016-02-23
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-02-23
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Thierry Reding <hidden> · 2016-02-23
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-02-23
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-02-25
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Doug Anderson <hidden> · 2016-03-07
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Thierry Reding <hidden> · 2016-03-10
Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update · Boris Brezillon <hidden> · 2016-03-11

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-02-04 11:04:28
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-leds, linux-pwm, linux-rockchip, lkml

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:04:20AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:

Sure.  ...but you agree that somehow you need a new API call for this,
right?  Somehow the PWM regulator needs to be able to say that it
wants the hardware state, not the initial state as specified in the
device tree.

Wouldn't the most direct way to do that be to just not specify anything
in the DT?  If there *is* something in DT but we ignore it that's a bit
weird.

Attachments

signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 473 bytes

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help