Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2015-09-18

Re: [RFC v4 17/25] powerpc, fbdev: Use arch_nvram_ops methods instead of nvram_read_byte() and nvram

From: Finn Thain <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-18 08:18:10
Also in: linux-m68k, linuxppc-dev, lkml

Hi Ben,

On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, I wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, I wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
Maybe we should have a dedicated accessor for "mac_xpram" ...
...

The arch_nvram_ops methods don't deal with structures like partitions ...
Instead of the accessor you suggested, perhaps it would be better to add a 
method like arch_nvram_ops.get_partition, to replace the 
pmac_get_partition() exported function?

The call sites for pmac_get_partition() are in the implementation of the 
IOC_NVRAM_GET_OFFSET ioctl that's used with /dev/nvram, and in 
pmac_xpram_read(). pmac_xpram_write() has no caller and could be removed.

But this doesn't have much to do with linux-fbdev. I think the old 
NV_CMODE/NV_VMODE issues*, which this patch avoids, are irrelevant to the 
problem of nvram module re-use, which is the aim of this patch series.

But if those issues really are relevant then we should move the discussion 
to the revised patch, that is, [RFC v6 16/25] powerpc, fbdev: Use NV_CMODE 
and NV_VMODE only when CONFIG_PPC32 and CONFIG_PPC_PMAC and CONFIG_NVRAM.

(There was no response to any patch in RFC v6 from any PowerPC 
maintainers, which is why I've revived this thread.)

* https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2001-November/012662.html

-- 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help