Re: [RFC 1/6] drm: Add top level Kconfig option for DRM fbdev emulation
From: Benjamin Gaignard <hidden>
Date: 2015-06-30 08:31:49
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-arm-msm, lkml
Hi, I think that what have been done by Rob with module_param is also a good idea: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c?idé0dfec78ec288d6c89a7b508a5c5d4ae8b7f934 Can you mix compilation flag and module param ? Benjamin 2015-06-30 9:56 GMT+02:00 Archit Taneja [off-list ref]:
Hi, On 06/30/2015 12:40 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:quoted
Any updates on this or too much distractions? I really think doing this would be awesome for the drm subsystem, instead of reinventing this wheel for each driver.I'd started on this again. I've got more free time now than before, so I should have something in a week or so. I agree it will help a lot (there are already two new drivers since we started discussing this!) Architquoted
-Daniel On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Vetter [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:47:54PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:quoted
Hi, On 03/13/2015 02:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:quoted
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:55:07AM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:quoted
On 03/11/2015 08:47 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:quoted
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:51:02PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:quoted
On 03/10/2015 05:47 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:52:41PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:quoted
On 03/10/2015 03:35 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:22:49PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:quoted
On 03/10/2015 03:17 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 03:11:28PM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:quoted
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig index 151a050..38f83a0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig@@ -40,6 +40,24 @@ config DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER help FBDEV helpers for KMS drivers. +config DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION + bool "Enable legacy fbdev support for your modesettingdriver" + depends on DRM + select DRM_KMS_HELPER + select DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER + select FB_SYS_FILLRECT + select FB_SYS_COPYAREA + select FB_SYS_IMAGEBLIT + select FB_SYS_FOPS + select FB_CFB_FILLRECT + select FB_CFB_COPYAREA + select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT + default y + help + Choose this option if you have a need for the legacy fbdev + support. Note that this support also provide the linux console + support on top of your modesetting driver.Maybe clarify that for linux console support you also need CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE? fbdev alone isn't enough.DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER selects that for us, right?Hm right I've missed that. Reminds me that you need one more patch at the end to remove all the various select DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER from all drm drivers. Otherwise this knob here won't work by default if you e.g. select radeon. In general we can't mix explicit options with menu entries with a select.I was trying that out. Removing DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER and having DRM_FBDEV_EMULATION disabled breaks drivers which use FB stuff internally in their respective xyz_fbdev.c files.But with the stubbed out functions that should work, right? Why doesn't it?There are still calls to functions from fb core like fb_set_suspend and register_framebuffer which aren't covered by the drm fb helper functions.Hm, sounds like we need another patch to stub out fb_set_suspend when fbdev isn't enabled. Is there anything else?There are a handful of fb core functions which are called by drm drivers: fb_alloc_cmap/fb_dealloc_cmap fb_sys_read/fb_sys_write register_framebuffer/unregister_framebuffer/unlink_framebuffer/ remove_conflicting_framebuffers fb_set_suspend fb_deferred_io_init/fb_deferred_io_cleanup framebuffer_alloc/framebuffer_releaseHm yeah that's somewhat annoying indeed. What about the following: 1. We move all the #include <linux/fb.h> from drivers into drm_fb_helper.h 2. Then we add stubs for these functions in drm_fb_helper.h, like this #if defined(CONFIG_FB) #include <linux/fb.h> #else /* static inline stubs for all the fb stuff used by kms drivers */ #endif Imo this makes sense since kms drivers really have a bit a special situation with fbdev. They're not full-blown fbdev drivers and can be useful fully without fbdev.I was trying this out. Removing 'linux/fb.h' and replacing stub fb funcs won't really work because struct declarations(like fb_info) also get removed. I considered placing '#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FB)' within linux/fb.h itself, but that seemed a bit too intrusive. This is what I'm currently doing: - Some funcs, like framebufer_alloc/release, alloc_cmap/dealloc_cmap would actually benefit if we have drm fb helpers for them. They are used in exactly the same manner by all the drivers. - For the rest of the functions that are sparsely used, I was considering making very simple drm_fb_* wrapper functions. Something like: void drm_fb_helper_deferred_io_init(struct drm_fb_helper *helper) { if (helper->fbdev) fb_deferred_io_init(helper->fbdev); } We could have all fb calls called within drm_fb_helper.c, creating drm_fb_helper_* stub functions would then be an easier task. What do you think?That's actually an option I considered, but I hoped we could do it with less work. If this indeed works and you can create the patch that would be awesome. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
-- Benjamin Gaignard Graphic Working Group Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog