Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 04/47] pci: add pci_ioremap_wc_bar()
From: Luis R. Rodriguez <hidden>
Date: 2015-03-25 20:39:24
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 04:03:46PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:17:54PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:quoted
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <redacted> This lets drivers take advanate of PAT when available. Thiss/advanate/advantage/
Amended.
quoted
should help with the transition of converting video drivers over to ioremap_wc() to help with the goal of eventually using _PAGE_CACHE_UC over _PAGE_CACHE_UC_MINUS on x86 on ioremap_nocache() (de33c442e)Please mention the title of the patch too: "x86 PAT: fix performance drop for glx, use UC minus for ioremap(), ioremap_nocache() and pci_mmap_page_range()"
Added.
quoted
Cc: Suresh Siddha <redacted> Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <redacted> Cc: Ingo Molnar <redacted> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <redacted> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Cc: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com> Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <redacted> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <redacted> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <redacted> --- drivers/pci/pci.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ include/linux/pci.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c index 81f06e8..6afd507 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c@@ -137,6 +137,20 @@ void __iomem *pci_ioremap_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar) pci_resource_len(pdev, bar)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ioremap_bar); + +void __iomem *pci_ioremap_wc_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar) +{ + /* + * Make sure the BAR is actually a memory resource, not an IO resource + */ + if (!(pci_resource_flags(pdev, bar) & IORESOURCE_MEM)) { + WARN_ON(1);Would it be better to use dev_warn ? That way you can see which BDF it is? Thought WARN will give a nice stack-trace that should easily point to the driver so perhaps not.. Either way - up to you.
I'm sticking to the style and use as with pci_ioremap_bar(). Whatever we pick we should make both use the same. More information is always better and since we do have dev_warn(), it would be nice to use that however within its use on both pci_ioremap_wc_bar() and pci_ioremap_bar() we have a use of the pdev with pci_resource_flags() and I believe if pdev is NULL we'd get a NULL dereference (dev_driver_string() is used), so it would seem it might be best to stick with a simple WARN_ON(). Arjan, any preference? Obviously if pdev is NULL your driver is dumb but as folks develop drivers this should be expected. Luis