On 10 March 2015 at 13:06, Dan Carpenter [off-list ref] wrote:
You should have said that in the patch description or under the ---
cut off. But anyway, it's not ok. And we'll need to redo this patch.
Breaking up patches into logical changes is sort of tricky because
everything touches everything else so the patch gets larger and larger.
Major apologies, I am still getting used to kernel development! I'll
be careful to not make such assumptions in future when it comes to
warnings/errors.
[snip]
But maybe it's only one line larger than the patch you just send? In
that case just fold it in and don't do the temporary casting.
The next patch after that could get rid of all the ramaining "volatile"
keywords.
It seems that we can in fact fix this problem with a single additional
change, I will submit a v2 shortly.
Best,
--
Lorenzo Stoakes
https:/ljs.io