On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:08:07AM +0100, Michel von Czettritz wrote:
The reintend fixes the
Spelling. re-indent.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
typedef void (*PROC_SPEC_SETUP)(struct lynx_share*,char *);
@@ -76,54 +76,54 @@ static inline void myspin_unlock(spinlock_t * sl){
static const struct fb_videomode lynx750_ext[] = {
/* 1024x600-60 VESA [1.71:1] */
{NULL, 60, 1024, 600, 20423, 144, 40, 18, 1, 104, 3,
- FB_SYNC_HOR_HIGH_ACT | FB_SYNC_VERT_HIGH_ACT, FB_VMODE_NONINTERLACED},
+ FB_SYNC_HOR_HIGH_ACT | FB_SYNC_VERT_HIGH_ACT, FB_VMODE_NONINTERLACED},
Do it like this:
{NULL, 60, 1024, 600, 20423, 144, 40, 18, 1, 104, 3,
FB_SYNC_HOR_HIGH_ACT | FB_SYNC_VERT_HIGH_ACT, FB_VMODE_NONINTERLACED},
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -141,8 +141,8 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_cursor(struct fb_info* info,struct fb_cursor* fbcursor)
cursor = &crtc->cursor;
if(fbcursor->image.width > cursor->maxW ||
- fbcursor->image.height > cursor->maxH ||
- fbcursor->image.depth > 1){
+ fbcursor->image.height > cursor->maxH ||
+ fbcursor->image.depth > 1){
This should be:
if (fbcursor->image.width > cursor->maxW ||
fbcursor->image.height > cursor->maxH ||
fbcursor->image.depth > 1)
return -ENXIO;
The new indenting is whacky.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
return -ENXIO;
}
@@ -153,19 +153,19 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_cursor(struct fb_info* info,struct fb_cursor* fbcursor)
if(fbcursor->set & FB_CUR_SETPOS){
cursor->setPos(cursor,fbcursor->image.dx - info->var.xoffset,
- fbcursor->image.dy - info->var.yoffset);
+ fbcursor->image.dy - info->var.yoffset);
}
This should be:
cursor->setPos(cursor, fbcursor->image.dx - info->var.xoffset,
fbcursor->image.dy - info->var.yoffset);
[tab][tab][tab][space][space][space][space][space][space][space]fbcursor->
Etc.
regards,
dan carpenter