Am Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:45:34 +0100
schrieb Maxime Ripard [off-list ref]:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:28:14PM +0100, niederp@physik.uni-kl.de
wrote:
quoted
From: Thomas Niederprüm <redacted>
A commit log is always nice :)
Will be added.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Thomas Niederprüm <redacted>
---
drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c index 02931c7..be91dfc 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
@@ -762,6 +762,11 @@ static int ssd1307fb_remove(struct i2c_client
*client) {
struct fb_info *info = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
struct ssd1307fb_par *par = info->par;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client,
SSD1307FB_DISPLAY_OFF);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
I don't think we really care about the return value here.
It might be even worse actually, since you'll end up in a intermediate
state, where you won't have freed everything, but your remove method
has been called still.
I agree. I will remove the check for the return statement.
Maxime