Am Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:45:34 +0100
schrieb Maxime Ripard [off-list ref]:

On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:28:14PM +0100, niederp@physik.uni-kl.de
wrote:

quoted

From: Thomas Niederprüm <redacted>

A commit log is always nice :)

Will be added.

quoted

Signed-off-by: Thomas Niederprüm <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c

b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c index 02931c7..be91dfc 100644

--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/ssd1307fb.c

@@ -762,6 +762,11 @@ static int ssd1307fb_remove(struct i2c_client

*client) {
 	struct fb_info *info = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
 	struct ssd1307fb_par *par = info->par;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	ret = ssd1307fb_write_cmd(par->client,
SSD1307FB_DISPLAY_OFF);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;

I don't think we really care about the return value here.

It might be even worse actually, since you'll end up in a intermediate
state, where you won't have freed everything, but your remove method
has been called still.

I agree. I will remove the check for the return statement.

Maxime