video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c

@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
 		if (bpp_values[i] = info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
 			reg_bpp = i;
-			continue;
 		}
 	}
 

-- 
1.8.1.2

the check for info is not required as we are checking it immediately
after gxfb_init_fbinfo() and lxfb_init_fbinfo() and returnig -ENOMEM
if it is NULL.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <redacted>
---
Hi Tomi,
This patch is similar to my last patch which you have already queued
for 3.20. if you can revert that then i can send you a single patch
with all these three changes together.

 drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c | 6 ++----
 drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c | 6 ++----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
index 1790f14..124d7c7 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c

@@ -444,10 +444,8 @@ static int gxfb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 		pci_release_region(pdev, 1);
 	}
 
-	if (info) {
-		fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
-		framebuffer_release(info);
-	}
+	fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
+	framebuffer_release(info);
 	return ret;
 }
 

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c
index 9e1d19d..138da6c 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c

@@ -577,10 +577,8 @@ err:
 		pci_release_region(pdev, 3);
 	}
 
-	if (info) {
-		fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
-		framebuffer_release(info);
-	}
+	fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
+	framebuffer_release(info);
 
 	return ret;
 }

-- 
1.8.1.2

Hello.

On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <redacted>
---
  drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

    {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

[...]

WBR, Sergei

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 09:31:39PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

Hello.

On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

quoted

continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

quoted

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c

@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
 		if (bpp_values[i] = info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
 			reg_bpp = i;
-			continue;
 		}

   {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

i have noticed that but thought that will be again a different type of change in a single patch.
but now it seems that this patch will introduce a new checkpatch warning, so i should have corrected that in it.
i will send a v2.

thanks
sudip

[...]

WBR, Sergei

On 06/01/15 14:45, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

the check for info is not required as we are checking it immediately
after gxfb_init_fbinfo() and lxfb_init_fbinfo() and returnig -ENOMEM
if it is NULL.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <redacted>
---
Hi Tomi,
This patch is similar to my last patch which you have already queued
for 3.20. if you can revert that then i can send you a single patch
with all these three changes together.

No need for that, two separate patches is fine. So queued for 3.20.

 Tomi