Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2014-11-13

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: simplefb: Specify node location and handoff relate

From: Tomi Valkeinen <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-13 15:52:39
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree

On 13/11/14 16:46, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,

On 11/13/2014 03:28 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
quoted
On 13/11/14 15:34, Hans de Goede wrote:
quoted
+chosen {
+	framebuffer0: framebuffer@5fc00000 {
 		compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
-		reg = <0x1d385000 (1600 * 1200 * 2)>;
+		reg = <0x5fc00000 (4096 * 1024)>;
Was there a reason for this change?
I changed the node name to match the new bindings text which
specifies that the node name must be framebuffer@<address>,
while at it I've taken a real world address range.

I assume you refer to the bit where the size of the reg property
is changed ? That indeed is not really necessary.
Yes, I meant the size of the reg prop. As this is an example, I think it
should be as clear as possible.

I guess a valid use case here is to set the size to larger-than-needed,
so that it gets preallocated and you don't need to worry about getting
the memory later when the system has already been running for a longer
time. But if that's the case in this example, I think it would be better
to describe it explicitly.

 Tomi

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help