Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2014-07-23

Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: uvesafb.c: Cleaning up variable that is never used

From: Rickard Strandqvist <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-23 20:45:13
Also in: lkml

Hi

There is a lot in what you say.
In the beginning I send in a remark to the maintainer. It happened
absolutely nothing.

When I send out a patch that code is not used, then this code will be
reviewed. Which is the main purpose!

However, agree that this was perhaps an unusually clear solution.
I submit such a patch now.

Kind regards
Rickard Strandqvist


2014-07-22 11:27 GMT+02:00 Pavel Machek [off-list ref]:
On Tue 2014-07-22 11:16:58, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
quoted
Hi

Sure, I agree. But as I thought that I would not change
currentfunctionality, I would increase the chance that the patches were
included. And it would of course also clarify this type of problem.
I'm trying to say that getting rid of the variables without changing
functionality might be wrong thing to do, for example in this case. It
looks like error handing is missing by mistake, and you are removing
traces saying that error handing is required here.

Dunno. Perhaps don't push patches where solution is not obvious?

Or push them but mark the place with fixme?

                                                                        Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help