Re: [PATCH] video: backlight: jornada720_lcd.c: Cleaning up variable that is never used
flat view
From: Jingoo Han <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-10 02:29:04
Also in:
lkml
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:08 AM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
2014-07-09 18:30 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones [off-list ref]:quoted
On Mon, 07 Jul 2014, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:quoted
Variable ar assigned a value that is never used. I have also removed all the code that thereby serves no purpose, and made same change to clarify the similarities in function. This was found using a static code analysis program called cppcheck Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <redacted> --- drivers/video/backlight/jornada720_lcd.c | 31 ++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/jornada720_lcd.c b/drivers/video/backlight/jornada720_lcd.c index da3876c..d16abcf 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/jornada720_lcd.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/jornada720_lcd.c@@ -36,44 +36,41 @@ static int jornada_lcd_get_power(struct lcd_device *ld) static int jornada_lcd_get_contrast(struct lcd_device *ld) { - int ret; + int ret = -ETIMEDOUT; if (jornada_lcd_get_power(ld) != FB_BLANK_UNBLANK) return 0; jornada_ssp_start(); - if (jornada_ssp_byte(GETCONTRAST) != TXDUMMY) { + if (jornada_ssp_byte(GETCONTRAST) != TXDUMMY) dev_err(&ld->dev, "get contrast failed\n"); - jornada_ssp_end(); - return -ETIMEDOUT; - } else { + else ret = jornada_ssp_byte(TXDUMMY); - jornada_ssp_end(); - return ret; - } + + jornada_ssp_end(); + + return ret; } static int jornada_lcd_set_contrast(struct lcd_device *ld, int value) { - int ret; + int ret = -ETIMEDOUT; jornada_ssp_start(); /* start by sending our set contrast cmd to mcu */ - ret = jornada_ssp_byte(SETCONTRAST); - + if (jornada_ssp_byte(SETCONTRAST) != TXDUMMY) + dev_err(&ld->dev, "set contrast failed\n"); /* push the new value */ - if (jornada_ssp_byte(value) != TXDUMMY) { + else if (jornada_ssp_byte(value) != TXDUMMY) dev_err(&ld->dev, "set contrast failed\n"); - jornada_ssp_end(); - return -ETIMEDOUT; - } + else /* if we get here we can assume everything went well */ + ret = 0; - /* if we get here we can assume everything went well */ jornada_ssp_end(); - return 0; + return ret; } static int jornada_lcd_set_power(struct lcd_device *ld, int power)Counter suggestion. What do you think, I think this looks cleaner: static int jornada_lcd_get_contrast(struct lcd_device *ld) { int ret; if (jornada_lcd_get_power(ld) != FB_BLANK_UNBLANK) return 0; jornada_ssp_start(); if (jornada_ssp_byte(GETCONTRAST) = TXDUMMY) { ret = jornada_ssp_byte(TXDUMMY); goto success; } dev_err(&ld->dev, "failed to set contrast\n"); ret = -ETIMEDOUT; success: jornada_ssp_end(); return ret; } static int jornada_lcd_set_contrast(struct lcd_device *ld, int value) { int ret = 0; jornada_ssp_start(); /* start by sending our set contrast cmd to mcu */ if (jornada_ssp_byte(SETCONTRAST) = TXDUMMY) { /* if successful, push the new value */ if (jornada_ssp_byte(value) = TXDUMMY) goto success; } dev_err(&ld->dev, "failed to set contrast\n"); ret = -ETIMEDOUT; success: jornada_ssp_end(); return ret; }Hi Lee! Yes, I agree! Both are clean without so much repetition of code, which was what annoyd me. But yours is clearer when things go good or bad, nice 1 ;)
Hi Rickard Strandqvist, I would liked to prefer Lee Jones's code. It looks cleaner.
I do not know what I can/may do, but I'll try. Remove what is not ok :-) Reviewed-by: Rickard Strandqvist <redacted> Suggested-by: Rickard Strandqvist <redacted>
I suggest the following. Suggested-by: Rickard Strandqvist <redacted> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted> Acked-by: Jingoo Han <redacted> Cc: Bryan Wu <redacted> Best regards, Jingoo Han
Kind regards Rickard Strandqvist