RE: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: omapfb: add coherent dma memory support
From: Hiremath, Vaibhav <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-09 08:31:16
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap
-----Original Message----- From: Valkeinen, Tomi Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 1:57 PM To: Hiremath, Vaibhav; Ivaylo Dimitrov; Ivaylo Dimitrov Cc: Tony Lindgren; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: omapfb: add coherent dma memory support On 2014-01-09 10:08, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:quoted
No, that's what is causing issue to me. Can you try predefined address flow? Just to highlight, I get UNDERFLOW during boot itself, immediately when itgets mapped to userspace.quoted
Boot LOG:quoted
[ 4.822549] Freeing unused kernel memory: 440K (c0919000 - c0987000) [ 5.276615] OMAPFB: pan_display(0) [ 5.276625] OMAPFB: setcmap [ 5.276635] OMAPFB: setcmap [ 5.293518] OMAPFB: user mmap region start a0000000, len 1536000, off 0 [ 5.300171] omapdss APPLY error: FIFO UNDERFLOW on gfx, disabling theoverlay Hmm that's interesting... So you have some tool that's ran early, which draws something on the screen? Or maybe that's X starting?
It's initial demo, not sure whether you heard of MATRIX demo. I am running Matrix demo As part of init script.
Ah... I think I understand now. As I mentioned, AM4x has issues already. I think the CPU/others can block DSS when accessing memory. So, if we have bad caching for the mapped framebuffer, the CPU will use more bandwidth when reading/writing to it, and that will cause DSS to underflow.
Yeah, AM4x already has some issues but I am comparing normal dma_alloc and reserved Memory and I see different behavior and it could be due to bad caching for the mapped buffers. Thanks, Vaibhav