Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 0/8] Clean up write-combining MTRR addition

From
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date
2013-05-10 01:21:55
Also in
dri-devel, lkml
Reply to
Jerome Glisse, 2013-05-09
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Jerome Glisse [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
A fair number of drivers (mostly graphics) add write-combining MTRRs.
Most ignore errors and most add the MTRR even on PAT systems which don't
need to use MTRRs.
This comment is wrong, as i said we need MTRR on PAT system for VRAM.
I didn't follow it last time.

 - If userspace is setting an MTRR directly, then it will work exactly
as before -- this patch has no effect on the userspace MTRR APIs.

 - If userspace uses the drm map interface with DRM_FRAME_BUFFER or
DRM_WRITE_COMBINING, there won't be an MTRR but the range will still
be WC.

 - If userspace uses GEM or TTM, then everything should still use WC
(TTM has explicit handling for this, which I presume is correct, and
i915, the major GEM user, already doesn't set an MTRR).

 - If userspace does not map the range, then either the kernel driver
is buggy or it doesn't matter because there's no map.

Is there a case I've missed?

--Andy
Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 3 authors, last reply 2013-05-10
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help