Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 8 authors, 2013-04-09

Re: [PATCH 10/10] drivers: misc: use module_platform_driver_probe()

From: Fabio Porcedda <hidden>
Date: 2013-03-21 13:10:40
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-ide, linux-input, linux-media, lkml

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wednesday 20 March 2013, Fabio Porcedda wrote:
quoted
I think we can check inside the  deferred_probe_work_func()
if the dev->probe function pointer is equal to platform_drv_probe_fail().
I think it's too late by then, because that would only warn if we try to probe
it again, but when platform_driver_probe() does not succeed immediately, it
Maybe you mean "does succeed immediately" ?
I mean in this code (simplified for the sake of discussion)

int __init_or_module platform_driver_probe(struct platform_driver *drv,
                int (*probe)(struct platform_device *))
{
        int retval, code;

        drv->probe = probe;
        retval = code = platform_driver_register(drv);

        drv->probe = NULL;
        if (code = 0 && list_empty(&drv->driver.p->klist_devices.k_list))
                retval = -ENODEV;
        drv->driver.probe = platform_drv_probe_fail;

        if (code != retval)
                platform_driver_unregister(drv);
        return retval;
}

we assume that all devices are bound to drivers during the call to
platform_driver_register, and if the device list is empty afterwards,
we unregister the driver and will never get to the deferred probing
stage.
Thanks for the explanation, I understand now that is not that simple.

I was hoping it was easier.

Regards
--
Fabio Porcedda
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help