Re: [RFC 1/4] video: panel: add CLAA101WA01A panel support

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Stephen Warren [off-list ref] wrote:

So this looks like a reasonable binding to me. The one issue is that
it's very generic, and if we go this route, we'll probably end up with
tens or hundreds of identical or extremely similar simple bindings, and
associated drivers.

We can avoid this instead by defining something like a "simple-lcd"
binding, and associated driver, that will work for perhaps 90%, 95%,
99%, even 100%(?) of panels.

That seems totally doable indeed. Actually the right way to do this
might be by extending the simple DPI panel driver Laurent included in
his patchset.

Just like the above, but with:

compatible="simple-panel", "chunghwa,claa101wa01a"

instead, and the driver binding to "simple-panel" rather than
"chunghwa,claa101wa01a".

Just out of curiosity, why don't we rather define

compatible="chunghwa,claa101wa01a", "simple-panel"

in that order? I thought DT compatible strings should go from more to
less specific. The device would still bind to "simple-panel" if no
more specific driver exists.

The driver can assume that a specific set of supplies (and perhaps
GPIOs) is always present, and that the /sequence/ of manipulating those
is fixed. This will avoid the need for anything like the power sequences
code. If a particular panel doesn't fit those assumptions, including the
exact sequence of manipulations for each state transition (which should
be documented in the binding) then it can get a custom driver, this also
avoiding having to define custom sequences in DT.

Things that might be parameterized/optional:

* Perhaps some GPIOs aren't always present.
* If some regulators aren't SW-controllable, DT should still provide a
fixed/dummy regulator so the driver doesn't care.

How about making all regulators and GPIO optional in the driver?

* Wait times between regulator/GPIO/... manipulation could be specified
in DT.
* For panels without EDID, CDF DT bindings can provide the list of
supported modes, otherwise we assume that the display controller that
drives the panel has been told how to access the EDID, just like it
would for an "external" display.

Excellent. Thanks for the feedback.

Alex.