On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 16:12:05 -0600
Timur Tabi [off-list ref] wrote:
Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
quoted
/* 0x88883316 */
- return MAKE_PF(3, 2, 0, 1, 3, 8, 8, 8, 8);
+ return MAKE_PF(3, 2, 1, 0, 3, 8, 8, 8, 8);
case 24:
/* 0x88082219 */
- return MAKE_PF(4, 0, 1, 2, 2, 0, 8, 8, 8);
+ return MAKE_PF(4, 0, 1, 2, 2, 8, 8, 8, 0);
case 16:
/* 0x65053118 */
return MAKE_PF(4, 2, 1, 0, 1, 5, 6, 5, 0);
You're right that the original values are incorrect, but I think your
patch is changing the wrong lines.
No.
I put this code in the driver:
printk(KERN_INFO "%s:%u 0x88883316 old %08x new %08x\n", __func__,
__LINE__, MAKE_PF(3, 2, 0, 1, 3, 8, 8, 8, 8), MAKE_PF(3, 2, 1, 0, 3, 8, 8,
8, 8));
printk(KERN_INFO "%s:%u 0x88082219 old %08x new %08x\n", __func__,
__LINE__, MAKE_PF(4, 0, 1, 2, 2, 0, 8, 8, 8), MAKE_PF(4, 0, 1, 2, 2, 8, 8,
8, 0));
printk(KERN_INFO "%s:%u 0x65053118 %08x\n", __func__, __LINE__,
MAKE_PF(4, 2, 1, 0, 1, 5, 6, 5, 0));
and it gave me this output:
fsl_diu_get_pixel_format:956 0x88883316 old 88883316 new 88889316
fsl_diu_get_pixel_format:957 0x88082219 old 8088c218 new 8808c218
fsl_diu_get_pixel_format:958 0x65053118 65059118
fsl_diu_get_pixel_format:956 0x88883316 old 88883316 new 88889316
fsl_diu_get_pixel_format:957 0x88082219 old 8088c218 new 8808c218
fsl_diu_get_pixel_format:958 0x65053118 65059118
Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 182x73
So the value for 32-bit is already correct, but your patch breaks it.
No, my patch doesn't break it. The patch also modifies the order of
red, blue, green arguments in the MAKE_PF() macro to red, green, blue
order since this is more natural:
-#define MAKE_PF(alpha, red, blue, green, size, c0, c1, c2, c3) \
+#define MAKE_PF(alpha, red, green, blue, size, c0, c1, c2, c3) \
value for 24-bit is wrong, but your patch just gives me another wrong
value. The value for 16-bit is wrong, but you don't change that.
No. Please read the whole patch and commit message again.
Thanks,
Anatolij