On 2012-12-14 17:01, Dan Carpenter wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
We added another kind of plane in 66a0f9e4ac "OMAPDSS: Use WB fifo for
GFX overlay" so this array needs a new entry as well.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <redacted>
---
Static checker work. I don't have a way to test this.
diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
index fedbd2c..bfe62cc 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/dss/dispc.c
@@ -3163,6 +3163,7 @@ static void dispc_dump_regs(struct seq_file *s)
[OMAP_DSS_VIDEO1] = "VID1",
[OMAP_DSS_VIDEO2] = "VID2",
[OMAP_DSS_VIDEO3] = "VID3",
+ [OMAP_DSS_WB] = "WB",
};
const char **p_names;
We don't count WB as an overlay currently, as it's handled a bit
differently, so we never try to access that array with OMAP_DSS_WB. We
don't actually dump any WB related registers currently, it seems.
So I think I'll leave this out for now.
Why does the static checker think OMAP_DSS_WB is needed in the array? I
wonder if I'm reading the code wrong, and we indeed do access the array
with OMAP_DSS_WB...
Tomi