Thread (4 messages) read the whole thread 4 messages, 4 authors, 2012-11-21

Re: [PATCH v12 2/6] video: add of helper for videomode

From: Steffen Trumtrar <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-21 11:48:43
Also in: dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-media

Hi!

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:12:43AM +0000, Manjunathappa, Prakash wrote:
Hi Steffen,

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 21:24:52, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
quoted
+/**
+ * of_get_display_timings - parse all display_timing entries from a device_node
+ * @np: device_node with the subnodes
+ **/
+struct display_timings *of_get_display_timings(const struct device_node *np)
+{
+	struct device_node *timings_np;
+	struct device_node *entry;
+	struct device_node *native_mode;
+	struct display_timings *disp;
+
+	if (!np) {
+		pr_err("%s: no devicenode given\n", __func__);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	timings_np = of_find_node_by_name(np, "display-timings");
I get below build warnings on this line
drivers/video/of_display_timing.c: In function 'of_get_display_timings':
drivers/video/of_display_timing.c:109:2: warning: passing argument 1 of 'of_find_node_by_name' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
include/linux/of.h:167:28: note: expected 'struct device_node *' but argument is of type 'const struct device_node *'
quoted
+ * of_display_timings_exists - check if a display-timings node is provided
+ * @np: device_node with the timing
+ **/
+int of_display_timings_exists(const struct device_node *np)
+{
+	struct device_node *timings_np;
+
+	if (!np)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	timings_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "display-timings", 0);
Also here:
drivers/video/of_display_timing.c: In function 'of_display_timings_exists':
drivers/video/of_display_timing.c:209:2: warning: passing argument 1 of 'of_parse_phandle' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
include/linux/of.h:258:28: note: expected 'struct device_node *' but argument is of type 'const struct device_node *'
The warnings are because the of-functions do not use const pointers where they
should. I had two options: don't use const pointers even if they should be and
have no warnings or use const pointers and have a correct API. (Third option:
send patches for of-functions). I chose the second option.

Regards,
Steffen


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help