Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 4 authors, 2012-11-16

Re: [PATCH v10 1/6] video: add display_timing and videomode

From: Grant Likely <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-15 18:03:59
Also in: dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-media

On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:00:57 +0100, Laurent Pinchart [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi Grant,

On Thursday 15 November 2012 15:47:53 Grant Likely wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:23:52 +0100, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
quoted
Add display_timing structure and the according helper functions. This
allows the description of a display via its supported timing parameters.

Every timing parameter can be specified as a single value or a range
<min typ max>.

Also, add helper functions to convert from display timings to a generic
videomode structure. This videomode can then be converted to the
corresponding subsystem mode representation (e.g. fb_videomode).

Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <redacted>
Hmmm... here's my thoughts as an outside reviewer. Correct me if I'm
making an incorrect assumption.

It looks to me that the purpose of this entire series is to decode video
timings from the device tree and (eventually) provide the data in the
form 'struct videomode'. Correct?

If so, then it looks over engineered. Creating new infrastructure to
allocate, maintain, and free a new 'struct display_timings' doesn't make
any sense when it is an intermediary data format that will never be used
by drivers.

Can the DT parsing code instead return a table of struct videomode?

But, wait... struct videomode is also a new structure. So it looks like
this series creates two new intermediary data structures;
display_timings and videomode. And at least as far as I can see in this
series struct fb_videomode is the only user.
struct videomode is supposed to slowly replace the various video mode 
structures we currently have in the kernel (struct drm_mode_modeinfo, struct 
fb_videomode and struct v4l2_bt_timings), at least where possible (userspace 
APIs can't be broken). This will make it possible to reuse code across the 
DRM, FB and V4L2 subsystems, such as the EDID parser or HDMI encoder drivers. 
This rationale might not be clearly explained in the commit message, but 
having a shared video mode structure is pretty important.
Okay that make sense. What about struct display_timings?

g.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help