Re: [PATCH v7 1/8] video: add display_timing struct and helpers
From: Steffen Trumtrar <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-04 16:53:18
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree, linux-media
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 09:08:42PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:28:01AM +0100, Steffen Trumtrar wrote: [...]quoted
+void timings_release(struct display_timings *disp) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < disp->num_timings; i++) + kfree(disp->timings[i]); +} + +void display_timings_release(struct display_timings *disp) +{ + timings_release(disp); + kfree(disp->timings); +}I'm not quite sure I understand how these are supposed to be used. The only use-case where a struct display_timings is dynamically allocated is for the OF helpers. In that case, wouldn't it be more useful to have a function that frees the complete structure, including the struct display_timings itself? Something like this, which has all of the above rolled into one: void display_timings_free(struct display_timings *disp) { if (disp->timings) { unsigned int i; for (i = 0; i < disp->num_timings; i++) kfree(disp->timings[i]); } kfree(disp->timings); kfree(disp); }
Well, you are right. They can be rolled into one function. The extra function call is useless and as it seems confusing. Regards, Steffen
_______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
-- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |