On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 09:49:21AM +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:07:45AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 19:59 +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
+
+ disp->num_timings = 0;
+
+ for_each_child_of_node(timings_np, entry) {
+ disp->num_timings++;
+ }
No need for { }
Okay.
Or you could just use of_get_child_count().
Thierry
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 09:31:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 09:49:21AM +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:07:45AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 19:59 +0200, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
+
+ disp->num_timings = 0;
+
+ for_each_child_of_node(timings_np, entry) {
+ disp->num_timings++;
+ }
No need for { }
Okay.
Or you could just use of_get_child_count().
Thierry
Ah, very nice. That's definitely better. Didn't know about that function.
Thanks,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |