Hi,
On Friday 28 of September 2012 09:11:09 Jingoo Han wrote:
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 10:45 PM Sylwester Nawrocki wrote
quoted
quoted
+Example:
+
+SOC specific portion:
+ dptx_phy: dptx_phy@0x10040720 {
+ compatible = "samsung,dp-phy";
+ samsung,dptx_phy_reg =<0x10040720>;
+ samsung,enable_bit =<1>;
+ };
+
+ display-port-controller {
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos5-dp";
+ reg =<0x145B0000 0x10000>;
+ interrupts =<10 3>;
+ interrupt-parent =<&combiner>;
+ dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>;
Shouldn't it be "samsung,dp_phy" ?
Do you mean this ? It is not working.
+ dp_phy = "samsung,dp_phy";
I believe he meant:
-+ dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>;
++ samsung,dp_phy =<&dptx_phy>;
to mark that this is a Samsung-specific property.
Best regards,
Tomasz Figa