Re: [PATCH v4] of: Add videomode helper
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2012-09-24 14:12:33
Also in:
dri-devel, linux-devicetree
Hi Rob, On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 08:42:12AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On 09/19/2012 03:20 AM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:quoted
This patch adds a helper function for parsing videomodes from the devicetree. The videomode can be either converted to a struct drm_display_mode or a struct fb_videomode. + +Required properties: + - hactive, vactive: Display resolution + - hfront-porch, hback-porch, hsync-len: Horizontal Display timing parameters + in pixels + vfront-porch, vback-porch, vsync-len: Vertical display timing parameters in + lines + - clock: displayclock in HzA major piece missing is the LCD controller to display interface width and component ordering.
Psst. We silently skipped this for now... I think having such a videomode helper is useful without having the data order part. We are aware that this should be added later, but I think currently it makes sense to concentrate on the basics.
quoted
+ +Optional properties: + - width-mm, height-mm: Display dimensions in mm + - hsync-active-high (bool): Hsync pulse is active high + - vsync-active-high (bool): Vsync pulse is active high + - interlaced (bool): This is an interlaced mode + - doublescan (bool): This is a doublescan mode + +There are different ways of describing a display mode. The devicetree representation +corresponds to the one commonly found in datasheets for displays. +The description of the display and its mode is split in two parts: first the display +properties like size in mm and (optionally) multiple subnodes with the supported modes. + +Example: + + display@0 {It would be useful to have a compatible string here. We may not always know the panel type or have a fixed panel though. We could define "generic-lcd" or something for cases where the panel type is unknown.
We expect the display nodes being subnodes of a driver (which of course has a compatible), or maybe referred to from a driver using phandles. So I don't see why the display node itself should have a compatible property. The display information is only ever useful in the context of a driver. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |