pwm-backlight: Use devm_pwm_get in pwm_bl.c

This file already makes use of device managed functions.
Convert pwm_get() too to use it.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <redacted>
---
 drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c |    7 ++-----
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index 4965408..0c91023 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c

@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pb->exit = data->exit;
 	pb->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
-	pb->pwm = pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+	pb->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
 	if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy API\n");
 

@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(bl)) {
 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register backlight\n");
 		ret = PTR_ERR(bl);
-		goto err_bl;
+		goto err_alloc;
 	}
 
 	bl->props.brightness = data->dft_brightness;

@@ -260,8 +260,6 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bl);
 	return 0;
 
-err_bl:
-	pwm_put(pb->pwm);
 err_alloc:
 	if (data->exit)
 		data->exit(&pdev->dev);

@@ -276,7 +274,6 @@ static int pwm_backlight_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	backlight_device_unregister(bl);
 	pwm_config(pb->pwm, 0, pb->period);
 	pwm_disable(pb->pwm);
-	pwm_put(pb->pwm);
 	if (pb->exit)
 		pb->exit(&pdev->dev);
 	return 0;

-- 
1.7.4.1

On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:42 PM Sachin Kamat wrote

This file already makes use of device managed functions.
Convert pwm_get() too to use it.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <redacted>

CC'ed Thierry Reding.

Acked-by: Jingoo Han <redacted>

10 more quoted lines

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:55:48AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:

On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:42 PM Sachin Kamat wrote

quoted

This file already makes use of device managed functions.
Convert pwm_get() too to use it.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <redacted>

CC'ed Thierry Reding.

Acked-by: Jingoo Han <redacted>

Hi Sachin,

As discussed elsewhere I'm taking over maintenance of the pwm-backlight
driver as part of the PWM subsystem. I hadn't been Cc'ed on your first
send and I'm not subscribed to linux-fbdev so I didn't receive a copy of
the patch.

Thanks,
Thierry

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:43:11AM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:

Hi Thierry,

On 17 September 2012 11:34, Thierry Reding
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:55:48AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:

quoted

On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:42 PM Sachin Kamat wrote

quoted

This file already makes use of device managed functions.
Convert pwm_get() too to use it.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <redacted>

CC'ed Thierry Reding.

Acked-by: Jingoo Han <redacted>

Hi Sachin,

As discussed elsewhere I'm taking over maintenance of the pwm-backlight
driver as part of the PWM subsystem.

That is really nice :)

 I hadn't been Cc'ed on your first

quoted

send and I'm not subscribed to linux-fbdev so I didn't receive a copy of
the patch.

Yes. I obtained the list from get_maintainers.pl, so missed out CCing you.
I will re-send the patch with you in CC now.

Yes, I've contacted Richard to get his approval as the backlight
subsystem maintainer. If he's okay I'll send a patch shortly to add the
corresponding files to MAINTAINERS so that next time I'll wind up in
that list.

Thierry

Hi Thierry,

On 17 September 2012 11:34, Thierry Reding
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:55:48AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:

quoted

On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 5:42 PM Sachin Kamat wrote

quoted

This file already makes use of device managed functions.
Convert pwm_get() too to use it.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <redacted>

CC'ed Thierry Reding.

Acked-by: Jingoo Han <redacted>

Hi Sachin,

As discussed elsewhere I'm taking over maintenance of the pwm-backlight
driver as part of the PWM subsystem.

That is really nice :)

 I hadn't been Cc'ed on your first

send and I'm not subscribed to linux-fbdev so I didn't receive a copy of
the patch.

Yes. I obtained the list from get_maintainers.pl, so missed out CCing you.
I will re-send the patch with you in CC now.

Thanks,
Thierry

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin