Re: [PATCH 05/11] OMAPDSS: add clk_prepare and clk_unprepare
STALE5212d
From: Rajendra Nayak <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-27 05:19:24
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-omap
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 09:49 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 17:47 -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:quoted
On 20120625-16:14, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:quoted
A question about clk_prepare/unprepare, not directly related: let's say I have a driver for some HW block. The driver doesn't use clk functions, but uses runtime PM. The driver also sets pm_runtime_irq_safe(). Now, the driver can call pm_runtime_get_sync() in an atomic context, and this would lead to the underlying framework (hwmod, omap_device, I don't know who =) enabling the func clock for that HW. But this would happen in atomic context, so the underlying framework can't use clk_prepare. How does the underlying framework handle that case? (sorry if that's a stupid question =).I think it's a good question! If we're going to call clk_prepare_enable from within a runtime pm callback then I think we'll need to check if _irq_safe() is set and conditionally call only clk_enable in such a case. I'm not a runtime pm expert, but if the driver owns the responsibility of calling pm_runtime_irq_safe then the driver has the proper context to know that it should call clk_prepare BEFORE calling pm_runtime_get_sync.That's not quite what I meant. If it's the driver that does clk_enable, be it in runtime PM callback or not, it's driver's responsibility. But some clocks are not handled by the driver, but the hwmod/omap_device framework. Mainly I think this is for the functional and interface clocks. The driver has no visibility to those, they are implicitly enabled via pm_runtime_get.
yes, thats the tricky part on how would hwmod/omap_device know if the driver would use runtime pm within atomic context or non-atomic context. The driver does inform the runtime pm framework about this by calling a pm_runtime_irq_safe(), which is then used to set the .irq_safe flag telling it to leave the interrupts disabled during callbacks. This information however does not flow down to hwmod/omap_device in any way. So the way its currently handled is to do an early prepare of all hwmod controlled clocks. I have copied Kevin in case he has any better ideas on how this should be handled.
Tomi