Re: [RFC 00/10] fblog: framebuffer kernel log driver
From: David Herrmann <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-18 19:06:20
Also in:
linux-serial, lkml
Hi On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:04 AM, David Herrmann [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi As some might know I am working on making CONFIG_VT obsolete. But as a developer it is often useful to have a kernel-log on the screen during boot to debug many common kernel(-config) errors. However, without CONFIG_VT we cannot use the VGA/framebbufer consoles either. Therefore, I am working on a small driver called "fblog". This driver simply writes the kernel log to all connected framebuffers. It works similar to fbcon but removes all the complexity of the virtual terminals. There is a sysfs attribute called "active" that allows to enable/disable fblog so user-space can start an xserver or similar. The main purpose is debugging kernel boot problems. Therefore, it is not optimized for speed and I tried keeping it simple. I splitted the patches into 10 small chunks to make review easier. I would be glad if someone could review this and tell me whether this is something we could include in mainline or not. There are still some issues but apart from them it works fine on my machine (x86): - I register the fblog device during module_init and need to call module_get(). However, this means it is impossible to call "rmmod fblog" as fblog has a reference to itself. Using "rmmod -f fblog" works fine but is a bit ugly. Is there a nice way to fix this? Otherwise I would need to call device_get() in module_exit() if there is a pending user of the fblog-device even though I unregistered it. - I redraw all framebuffers while holding the console-lock. This may slow down machines with more than 2 framebuffers (like 10 or 20). However, as this is supposed to be a debug driver, I think I can ignore this? If someone wants to improve the redraw logic to avoid redrawing the whole screen all the time, I would be glad to include it in this patchset :) - I am really no expert regarding the framebuffer subsystem. So I would appreciate it if someone could comment whether I need to handle the events in a different way or whether it is ok the way it is now.
One additional issue: With udlfb.c we have hotplug capable framebuffers. However, fbcon and fblog currently never close a framebuffer if not explicitely requested by user-space. Therefore, if a framebuffer device is removed, the FB_EVENT_FB_UNREGISTER event will never be sent because fbcon/fblog still have a reference to the framebuffer(-driver). Therefore, the number of available fbs will grow until there are no more free indices. See dlfb_usb_disconnect() in udlfb.c for an example. It does not invoke unregister_framebuffer() unless the last user closed the FB. udlfb disables the console on its framebuffer devices to avoid this, but this doesn't seem to be a good solution. How about sending an FB_EVENT_FB_DISCONNECT event during unlink_framebuffer()? This still doesn't force user-space to close /dev/fbX but it at least will make it possible to fblog/fbcon to close the framebuffer. fbmem.c can then still be modified to mark the open file as dead so user-space will also close the device hopefully. Regards David