Re: [PATCH] i2c: Split I2C_M_NOSTART support out of I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:58:15AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:52:11AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

Also, I'd think the FUNC_NOSTART bit should be 0x08 and SMBUS_PEC 0x4000. This
will be more intuitive, probably?

What is the value in renumbering everything?  It just seems like it
makes the diff less clear and has no practical value.

Not everything, only those 2. The result would be having one block dealing
with I2C and one block with SMBUS. But Jean's comment is an ultimate
"no" anyway.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |