Thread (48 messages) 48 messages, 4 authors, 2012-05-10

Re: [PATCH 00/25] OMAPDSS: DT preparation patches v2

From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: 2012-05-08 16:00:50
Also in: linux-omap

* Tomi Valkeinen [off-list ref] [120508 01:48]:
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:46 -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
Hi,

* Tomi Valkeinen [off-list ref] [120503 07:01]:
quoted
Hi,

I started cleaning up and restructuring omapdss for device tree, and here's the
first set of patches from that ordeal. There's nothing DT specific in these
patches, but they are mostly generic cleanups that make sense even without DT.

This is the second version of these patches, the previous version can be found
from: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fbdev/msg05667.html

The first 21 patches, which were in the previous version, have only gotten
minor cleanups (and, of course, more testing). The last 4 patches are new. The
most important of those patches is the DSI pin config patch, which makes it
possible for the panel driver to configure the DSI pins it needs.

This series can also be found from:
git://gitorious.org/linux-omap-dss2/linux.git work/devtree-base
Nice clean up. Can you please put the first 12 arch/arm/*omap*/* touching
patches (and the drivers/video dependencies needed) into a separate branch
and send me a pull request. That is assuming those patches are now immutable.

Then I can pull it into cleanup-dss branch that we both can merge as
needed.
Ok, I'll see how it goes. Do I have your ack for the board file changes?
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
 
Do you want to have patches that touch only
arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c, but not the board files? That's a dss
specific file, and I don't expect anyone else to make changes to it, so
chances for conflicts should be quite minimal.
Yes probably board-*.c files are enough to avoid annoying merge conflicts.

Regards,

Tony
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help